LOWELL CHARTER TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR
MEETING
PRESENT: Batchelor, Blough, Cornish, Sanford, Simmonds
ABSENT: None
STUDENT REP: B. Batchelor
The
regular meeting of the Lowell Charter Township Planning Commission was called
to order by Chairman Cornish at 7:00 p.m.
APPROVAL OF PRIOR MEETING
MINUTES:
The minutes of the December 9, 2002 Regular Meeting were considered. Batchelor moved to approve. Seconded by Blough. All in favor and the minutes were approved as presented.
COMMERCIAL PUD ORDINANCE
REVISION:
Tim Johnson (Main Street Planning) was present to discuss revisions to the existing Section 3.7 of the Ordinance.
Mr.
Johnson presented a proposed revision to the Commercial Planned Unit
Development Ordinance. The revision is
identified as No. 01-__-Z and accompanied his letter of January 2, 2003.
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance in detail. This included some of
the following:
3.7.1
- Improved description and
purpose. Provides more flexibility.
3.7.2
- Commercial PUD’s only allowed
where permitted by the Master Plan and
Zoning.
3.7.3.B
- Allow residential uses located above commercial office use – This issue
must be decided.
3.7.3.C - Allows flexibility,
but also allows subjective interpretation.
Leave it in.
3.7.4
- Minimum Lot Size. Current requirement is 20 acres. Suggested minimum is
5 acres. Much discussion. Will revise the ordinance to a minimum of 5
acres. Also will allow the Planning Commission to
waive this minimum
requirement.
3.7.5
- Design Standards. Many are the same as in the existing
ordinance.
3.7.5.I
- Current ordinance sets a limit
of 50% of the area to be covered by imper-
vious surfaces. Much discussion. Should we allow more area to be covered
by buildings and paved
areas? Tim Johnson will research this
further and
present additional
information to the Planning Commission.
This issue
must be decided.
Planning
Commission Meeting Minutes
January
13, 2003
Page
2
3.7.5.J-O
- New sections suggested for the
ordinance. All appear acceptable. The
Planning Commission
may wish to improve the separate/stand alone
ordinances for
lighting and landscaping.
This
concluded the review of the proposed Commercial PUD Ordinance revisions. There are two outstanding issues:
-
3.7.3.B - Allow residential
above commercial/offices?
-
3.7.5.I - How much area should be covered by
impervious surfaces?
The
Planning Commission and Tim Johnson will do further research and plan to
address these items at the February 10, 2003 regular meeting. If these items can be resolved, the Planning
Commission will then set a date for a public hearing on this ordinance change.
Jerry Denning (Township Enforcement Officer) was present to discuss the lighting issue at the Zeigler Ford Dealership.
It
appears that Zeigler has reset the angles of the top tier of pole lights. They have aimed them downward even further. The result is much improved. A number of Planning Commissioners had
checked these lights and concur that this situation had greatly improved.
It
was noted that the eight lights on the side of the building were still a
problem. These lights need to be
screened or modified to reduce their glare.
The
Planning Commission requested that the Enforcement Officer contact Zeigler Ford
and advise:
-
The pole issue has improved and appears to be resolved as long as they
maintain the
current situation.
-
The eight lights on the side of the building must be addressed and
corrected. These
lights need screening or other measures
to improve the situation.
The
Enforcement Office will contact Zeigler
related to the above and keep the Planning Commission advised of the
progress.
Commissioner
Sanford advised that we need to develop a solid lighting ordinance. A suggestion is to allow citizen input to
this process. He also provided lighting
ordinance material to the Planning Commission.
This will be addressed with the Planning Commission's plan to
review/improve/develop ordinances.
Planning
Commission Meeting Minutes
January
13, 2003
Page
3
JOHN MOKMA – 10798 52ND
STREET:
Mr.
Mokma owns a parcel of land which is 10 acres with 261 feet of frontage on 52nd Street. This parcel is located in AG-2 Zoning which
requires a minimum of 4 acre parcels with 200 feet of road frontage.
Mr.
Mokma has an existing home on the land.
He wants to split the property and sell two additional parcels for
homes. He would like access to the
additional parcels via a private road.
The
Planning Commission explained the ordinance and zoning requirements to Mr.
Mokma. Under the current situation:
-
Has enough acreage for two lots (10 acres)
-
Has enough road frontage for one lot (261 feet)
The
Planning Commission noted that he does have 400 feet on his back lot line. The Planning Commission suggested that he
buy additional land to give him 400 feet of road frontage. With that, he could split off one more
parcel. The Planning Commission could then consider access to the second parcel
via a shared drive.
Mr.
Mokma will consider this matter further.
KEN FRIEDRICH – 52ND
STREET/TIMPSON:
Mr. Friedrich was present to discuss his proposed
residential PUD at 52nd Street and Timpson.
Mr. Friedrich owns approximately 37 acres at this
location, which includes his home.
Mr. Friedrich wants to develop some parcels on 2
acre lots. This would be allowed via a
PUD.
Mr. Friedrich wants to have an increased density of
parcels in this AG-2 Zone. The Planning
Commission
advised that his density must conform to the ordinances. It appears that the maximum number of total
lots that could be allowed is nine.
The
Planning Commission recommended that Mr. Friedrich make formal application for
the residential PUD and follow the current Ordinance. He will consider.
M. ROSENBERGER:
Mr. Rosenberger was present to advise of a situation related to the Whispering Hills Residential Sub-Division. Mr. Rosenberger’s property is adjacent to Barnsley Road which is on the edge of the development.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
January 13, 2003
Page 4
There appears to be issues related to trading property parcels between Mr. Rosenberger and Dykema Development.
The Planning Commission advised that as long as the developer was proceeding with what was approved by the Planning Commission, there was not anything they could do related to Mr. Rosenberger’s issues. If the developer changes from what was approved, the Planning Commission could become involved.
The Planning Commission asked to be kept advised of this situation.
RV STORAGE
ORDINANCE:
The Planning Commission will address this at their next workshop meeting.
OTHER:
There is a deadline of March 30, 2003 for action on the Model Stormwater Ordinance.
The Township Board requests that the Planning Commission take action on the following items:
- Lighting Ordinance
- Adult Entertainment Ordinance
The Planning Copmmission will hold a workshop meeting on Monday, January 27, 2003 to work on ordinances.
CONCLUSION:
Sanford moved to adjourn. Seconded by Cornish. All in favor and the regular meeting of
the Lowell Charter Township Planning Commission was adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
Submitted by D. Simmonds, Secretary